Watched the first two vids part of more and our voice our vision.
Will hold my overall judgement for a bit, as I have not watched all the player vids .
What struck me watching the ""part of more """ vid was it seemed to be trying to satisfy some government agency about women's involvement in rugby. Don't get me wrong I am happy for women to be involved and the womens Olympic team arguably halted rugby's slide at the time. But its also has the feeling of falseness as the history of women in rugby and the numbers that play seem to be put on par with mens rugby. I think that is unfair for both
I guest the theme of the "part of more" vid was how rugby brings in community and teaches a sense of purpose. Would it make a non rugby person wanta take a second look at rugby or would the non rugby person see it as another corporate vid. Or is the vid aimed at keeping rugby people in the camp.
I have mixed feeling on the """part of move"'' the first vid . Also the name also seems like maybe Hunter Reds were consumed instead of coffee in Oxford street when choosing the name. Each vids has part of more I guess saying its part of a bigger picture, maybe a bit nit pickie on my part here.
The second vid "our voice our vision" I struggling to see non rugby folk getting overly excited by it. Great turn on for the already hard core rusted on but will it drive into new markets.
Maybe old school but somewhere I would have a sound drop of Hayley Westenra " the world in Union""
Say from 1:32 to 2:10 add some visuals.
I am still trying to work out who its aimed at. But in these areas I am a very harsh critic, I worked on Murdoch's personal staff for just over two years and those News meetings torn most things to shreds so it could just be me.
Will think on it a bit more and watch some extra vids and comment more latter.
[COLOR=var(--yt-endpoint-color, hsl(0, 0%, 6.7%))]
4:33
[/COLOR]