• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Reclaiming the Name of Rugby

Status
Not open for further replies.

RugbyFuture

Lord Logo
Article i posted at the roar, got through but was complained about by mungos so much it got pulled. thought i could post it here.

Rugby is a Growing worldwide sport, which proudly holds the name of the Rugby School rules it was named after. However Like that little annoying fly which just keeps coming back, rugby league and its supporters continually claim the name to themselves, despite a non-lineal Genealogy.

Since Joining this group of endeavouring opinionists and aspiring sports columnists at the roar, I have noticed, every time a person refers to rugby the “oh but wait rugby already does this, union doesn’t” comment, from a select few members. It’s about time this was set straight. The Roar refers to rugby union as rugby and league as league, and if this doesn’t sway you enough, so does the SMH and even the Sydney based News Ltd. Paper the daily telegraph, the owners of Rugby league.

If this isn’t enough for the leagueys, then looking at football (soccer) being claimants of the earliest form referred to as football and having the most people in the world claim it as Football and therefore claiming that name, then in any case Rugby Union IS Rugby. Truth in the human world is always by the greatest numbers agreeing, the democratic vote. The fact That Leagueys keep on claiming the proud name of rugby, which is named after a private school (and thus anti league) may I add, although it only being played and known in Australia’s eastern states and the north of England is idiotic, The exception is always league, its time they learnt this.

It is about time that Rugby claims the name, holistically, in order to gain the upper hand, and the title of its heritage.

The best way to do this, I see, is to force adjustment to clubs a names and sit on trademarks. For example, Eastwood District Rugby Union Football Club, be asked to change the name to Eastwood District Rugby Football Club. The same goes for Randwick and local clubs. Furthermore, reserving names such as NSW Rugby and Rugby NSW as copyright protection properties would be part of this. Already, League clubs call themselves league clubs, and by reserving the rugby football name, rugby union would, by default, secure on all accounts the name of rugby as theirs.
 

Thomond78

Colin Windon (37)
The reason the RFU is just that, is it's the Rugby Football Union; i.e., the Union of those playing the football played at Rugby, the school.

League is a splitter code. It's the breakaway, so it doesn't get the name. The RFU pre-dates the 1895 split, as does the IRFU (same), the WRU (no other kind in Wales, mun), and the SRU (we wullnae hae that sortae nonsence in Hawick).

There's rugby, and there's league. Boofballing is dead, everywhere bar Oz, PNG and the M62. Anyone claiming the contrary is in pure "Fog in Channel, World Cut Off" mode. Sod 'em.
 

Lindommer

Simon Poidevin (60)
Staff member
Thomond78 said:
The reason the RFU is just that, is it's the Rugby Football Union; i.e., the Union of those playing the football played at Rugby, the school.

League is a splitter code. It's the breakaway, so it doesn't get the name. The RFU pre-dates the 1895 split, as does the IRFU (same), the WRU (no other kind in Wales, mun), and the SRU (we wullnae hae that sortae nonsence in Hawick).

There's rugby, and there's league. Boofballing is dead, everywhere bar one and a half bits of Oz, PNG and the M62. Anyone claiming the contrary is in pure "Fog in Channel, World Cut Off" mode. Sod 'em.

fixed
 

Cutter

Nicholas Shehadie (39)
RugbyFuture said:
Article i posted at the roar, got through but was complained about by mungos so much it got pulled. thought i could post it here.

Rugby is a Growing worldwide sport, which proudly holds the name of the Rugby School rules it was named after. However Like that little annoying fly which just keeps coming back, rugby league and its supporters continually claim the name to themselves, despite a non-lineal Genealogy.

Since Joining this group of endeavouring opinionists and aspiring sports columnists at the roar, I have noticed, every time a person refers to rugby the “oh but wait rugby already does this, union doesn’t” comment, from a select few members. It’s about time this was set straight. The Roar refers to rugby union as rugby and league as league, and if this doesn’t sway you enough, so does the SMH and even the Sydney based News Ltd. Paper the daily telegraph, the owners of Rugby league.

If this isn’t enough for the leagueys, then looking at football (soccer) being claimants of the earliest form referred to as football and having the most people in the world claim it as Football and therefore claiming that name, then in any case Rugby Union IS Rugby. Truth in the human world is always by the greatest numbers agreeing, the democratic vote. The fact That Leagueys keep on claiming the proud name of rugby, which is named after a private school (and thus anti league) may I add, although it only being played and known in Australia’s eastern states and the north of England is idiotic, The exception is always league, its time they learnt this.

It is about time that Rugby claims the name, holistically, in order to gain the upper hand, and the title of its heritage.

The best way to do this, I see, is to force adjustment to clubs a names and sit on trademarks. For example, Eastwood District Rugby Union Football Club, be asked to change the name to Eastwood District Rugby Football Club. The same goes for Randwick and local clubs. Furthermore, reserving names such as NSW Rugby and Rugby NSW as copyright protection properties would be part of this. Already, League clubs call themselves league clubs, and by reserving the rugby football name, rugby union would, by default, secure on all accounts the name of rugby as theirs.

If I was rude, I'd say get a life, but I'm not so I'm just going to say that you have too much time on your hands.
 

Scotty

David Codey (61)
If I was rude, I'd say get a life, but I'm not so I'm just going to say that you have too much time on your hands.

That is a very Lee Grant way of insulting someone.
 

Thomond78

Colin Windon (37)
Scarfman said:
And the non Nazi-collaborating French.

One of the great boofballer legends. Unfortunately, it's a pile of shite. There were more resistants coming from rugby than boofball. The reason Vichy had a down on the boofballers was that they were pro, and the French had been kicked out of the 5N just before the war for just that reason. It was business, rather than competing for sport's sake. Of course, the fact that it only happened during four years in the mid-40s when there was no international rugby (bar AB-Bok games arranged in North Africa, surrounded by half the AA guns in the Western Desert...), and that the boofballers ended up where they were before - i.e., nowhere - even after that is never mentioned.

If you really want the Nazi attitude to rugby, you can see it in the fact that they made sure to stamp it out in Germany.
 

Gagger

Nick Farr-Jones (63)
Staff member
I reject that slur! I believe we have both QLD and NSW GPS schools represented here.....
 

DPK

Peter Sullivan (51)
ive been to public and private schools and played rugby in both. the differences are interesting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top