Yeah i'll believe that when i've read the fine print twice.
did any of you read the full article??
"The early proposal also includes a tier-two version of the competition operating at the same time as the major league, with a promotion/relegation system used to decide who swaps in and out of the bottom two spots each year."
Who reads?did any of you read the full article??
"The early proposal also includes a tier-two version of the competition operating at the same time as the major league, with a promotion/relegation system used to decide who swaps in and out of the bottom two spots each year."
I think if we were suddenly bereft of Rugby Championship money we would go broke near instantly.Derpus, I reckon the Wallabies could do with kind of accountability right about now.
but in all likelihood, the difference between say even argentina down to italy, japan, fiji is quite a step. Even after this dreadful year the wallabies would still be safe from relegation.
How else would it work?the real problem would be if Italy or one of the 2 extra teams in an expanded RC were relegated - does that mean they are relegated from the 6 Nations/RC as well. 6 nations doesnt do relegation.
More likely scenario...............SH teams schedule
0 tests in Feb
3 tests in July v NH in SH
5 tests in Aug/Sept v SH in SH (considering Japan as an adopted SH team)
3 tests in Nov v NH in NH
semi's & finals
Again, I'm skeptical. It means all the teams (except the All Blacks obviously) risk having a shocker season and getting relegated, and losing all of the money as a result.
More likely scenario.....
0 tests in Feb
3 tests in July v NH in SH
6 tests in July/Aug/Sept v TRC
2 tests in September v Others
3 tests in Nov v NH
Final (Wallabies not required)
Frankly, that's up to them. I can't see any of the SANZAR members cutting the TRC. They need the broadcast and home games each year against the old rivals.Strewth, I imagine you are contemplating a home and away series for TRC? In that case, what do Japan and Fiji do for their extra 5 games?