• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

NSW AAGPS 2025 (banter and commentary)

F

Fantastic Sir Toad

Stan Wickham (3)
1748758219960.png
Fairland is due for redevelopment and there's a fundraising drive going. Any thoughts on the proposed design from fellow GPS rugby enjoyers.
 
F

fortheloveofthegame

Herbert Moran (7)
The Chairman said:
Team of the Week Round 3

1. Jarrett (E)
2. Sides (S)
3. Bloomfield (K)
4. Muir (N)
5. Dooley (J)
6. Toia (K)
7. Thomas (N)
8. Fonua (K)
9. Grover (I)
10. King (N)
11. Troy (J)
12. Anitela-Tsloussis (N)
13. Scarr (I)
14. Roberts-Lintmeijer (N)
15. Grantham (N)

Chairman's Player of the Round: Jarryd King (Newington)
Click to expand...
how do you pick your team if the round? what process do you follow.
 
The Kick Chaser

The Kick Chaser

Bob McCowan (2)
JoeBoar03 said:
Did anyone else see Shore number 12s punch. Disgraceful act. He should serve a hefty suspension if the AAGPS takes these matters seriously.
Click to expand...
You might be reffering to something else, but what I think your talking about is when the New boy was grabbing and holding on to the Shore players Jersey and the Shore player hit his arm away. How does that deserve anything....
 
W

Wingdog

Frank Row (1)
Where's the beef said:
I watched the last couple of weeks at Joeys, Like a few people on this, I always seek to sit in the same place. There is another on this forum that I generally sit with a few years older.

While Newington had a very solid game against Joeys, you never felt Joeys were out of it. Yesterday, pretty simply you did.

Joeys kicked alot of ball away last week, this week a run at all costs first half punished them.

For the first time I saw their scrum get monstered, and more importantly neither their forwards no backs made ground consistently.

Passes in the backs were often at shoulder height presenting rib cages which Kings took full advantage of.

If joeys want to be anywhere near the top on this, then they must get some go forward up front. Their 10 is being murdered because of the backfoot ball.

In the backs, They Crabbed pretty much all day. Part off this is the ball, Part of it may be not. The Joeys 2nds backline is square and consequently forces sides to square up and they feed off it. The key to 2nds is the pack and the speed of delivery.

The truth of the matter is that the scoreline did not fully reflect the dominance kings had.

Even when the 2nds 5/8 came on, he had little impact because of the poor quality ball.

Justice had a tough day at the back of a retreating scrum.

This pressure played into heaps of Dropped ball from Joeys.

A tough Thursday Game awaits against Scots and I fear the heads are down.

The following game against View could realistically see Joeys 1 from 5.

Hurts to say this as an old boy, but, thats what I saw

Well done to the kings cows, they would be mooing all the way back to parra.
Beef out
Click to expand...
A good summary, thankyou for sharing. I was also at the game at HH. It's clear to me if Joey's don't make changes they'll struggle with all games. The forward pack, with the exception of some key players, isn't performing, or working together as a team. With a 2nds team behind them putting 50 plus points on some good teams in recent weeks, it suggests that Joeys haven't picked the best line up for the 1sts, with particular focus on the front and back rows. Sticking to something that's not working will hurt their chances for the rest of the competition. Kings were a great team and played to Joey's weakness through the forward pack, putting added pressure on the back line. As well as reviewing and making some player changes, coaching styles must come in to why 2 teams under the same roof are playing such different styles of rugby. I wonder if we're seeing a scenario play out where the 2nds team of the school is possibly stronger then their 1sts. I'm sure this isn't the intention of the coaches selecting the teams. Some tough decisions ahead.... All things aside, it was a great day of rugby and again boys from both schools should be commended for the way they conducted themselves. Wishing the boys all the best for the next game, unfortunately I won't be at the next one so looking forward to the commentary in the chat, pre and post games.
 
PigSkin

PigSkin

Bob McCowan (2)
Joeys 1’s were flat on Saturday. A bit like Kings the week before. Hopefully something changes otherwise I see them battling Scots for second last. However never write off The Joeboys.

The 16A’s game was a cracka at Hunters Hill. Unfortunately the Kings lads played uphill against Joeys who received the home ground advantage…..maybe a bit to often.
 
F

fortheloveofthegame

Herbert Moran (7)
Wingdog said:
A good summary, thankyou for sharing. I was also at the game at HH. It's clear to me if Joey's don't make changes they'll struggle with all games. The forward pack, with the exception of some key players, isn't performing, or working together as a team. With a 2nds team behind them putting 50 plus points on some good teams in recent weeks, it suggests that Joeys haven't picked the best line up for the 1sts, with particular focus on the front and back rows. Sticking to something that's not working will hurt their chances for the rest of the competition. Kings were a great team and played to Joey's weakness through the forward pack, putting added pressure on the back line. As well as reviewing and making some player changes, coaching styles must come in to why 2 teams under the same roof are playing such different styles of rugby. I wonder if we're seeing a scenario play out where the 2nds team of the school is possibly stronger then their 1sts. I'm sure this isn't the intention of the coaches selecting the teams. Some tough decisions ahead.... All things aside, it was a great day of rugby and again boys from both schools should be commended for the way they conducted themselves. Wishing the boys all the best for the next game, unfortunately I won't be at the next one so looking forward to the commentary in the chat, pre and post games.
Click to expand...
Ghattas was Joeys best forward but he is playing out of position, i’d play him at 2 and bring up the 7 from the 2’s. But the back row isn’t the problem, the other tight five players are a real issue, under size for this level and I would say not mobile or skilful enough to make up for it. The reason why the seconds are dominating though is a combo of a decent team and a weak seconds comp (the natural outcome of other schools development programs ). add in much better coaching in the seconds particularly in terms of man management and a clear picture forms.
 
B

bigbaldpauline

Bob McCowan (2)
Kings vs Joeys

unreal atmosphere and geat place to watch footy. young finn hannion and ed garcia the 7 for joeys tore the kings 2s apart.

1st xv great game and contast minto wasted on the wing i feel, kings 1-15 all played exceptional espicelly there young 7. noticed sayer running the tee any idea why he wasn't playing, also update risati and why wasnt sayer plaing ?
 
J

JoeBoar03

Bob McCowan (2)
The Kick Chaser said:
You might be reffering to something else, but what I think your talking about is when the New boy was grabbing and holding on to the Shore players Jersey and the Shore player hit his arm away. How does that deserve anything....
Click to expand...
Completely different play. Timestamp 1:00:56 right side of the screen. Shore number 12 stands up and punches Newington 17 unprovoked. No place for this in the game. Disgusting
 
Rugbynbeers

Rugbynbeers

Billy Sheehan (19)
bigbaldpauline said:
Kings vs Joeys

unreal atmosphere and geat place to watch footy. young finn hannion and ed garcia the 7 for joeys tore the kings 2s apart.

1st xv great game and contast minto wasted on the wing i feel, kings 1-15 all played exceptional espicelly there young 7. noticed sayer running the tee any idea why he wasn't playing, also update risati and why wasnt sayer plaing ?
Click to expand...

Sawyer sustained a ankle injury last week, poor kid can’t catch a break.
 
J

JoeBoar03

Bob McCowan (2)
I’d even go so far as to say this strike was much worse then that at Bellevue hill and Stanmore in round 1. The sheer malice behind the punch was something else. Us old boys were extremely unhappy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top