Brumby Runner
Jason Little (69)
Seconds should not be reffing at this level. He is absolutely woeful.
So much for SAZAAR's much hyped meritocracy. A few others are probably not far advanced on Egon.
Seconds should not be reffing at this level. He is absolutely woeful.
Owens is a home ref for the ABs.
I meant for internationals you’d have some adjustment made on the basis of the historical performance under a certain ref (not dependent on home/away). Anyway, kind of getting off the beaten track here but I’d be interested to know if the bookies do adjust based on referee because that would be suggestive.
It was a joke, can you really expect not to see a light-hearted jibe at NZ’s expense on an Aus rugby forum? In any case, Ireland were whinging about having Owens against the ABs in the quarters last year so it’s not a Wallaby only phenomenon. Interestingly, a lot of people seem to be taking the stats posted on this forum quite seriously.That is exactly the kind of remark that is the reason noone with much sense takes notice of what is posted on forums!
Who are the home refs for the Wallabies, or are you one of the one who claims that the Wallabies are always hard done by?
That is exactly the kind of remark that is the reason noone with much sense takes notice of what is posted on forums!
Who are the home refs for the Wallabies, or are you one of the one who claims that the Wallabies are always hard done by?
Ok sorry UTG, just I was taking most of the posts seriously and thought us starting to pick out certain refs in tests etc was not helping argument. I still get pissed off with AB any supporters including my own AB supporters that point at refs in tests and allude that they favour one team over another, when it really an excuse for their team losing.It was a joke, can you really expect not to see a light-hearted jibe at NZ’s expense on an Aus rugby forum? In any case, Ireland were whinging about having Owens against the ABs in the quarters last year so it’s not a Wallaby only phenomenon. Interestingly, a lot of people seem to be taking the stats posted on this forum quite seriously.
Was at a rugby dinner a couple of years ago before an international game in Brisbane that Nigel Owens and Wayne Barnes amongst others spoke at .It was a joke, can you really expect not to see a light-hearted jibe at NZ’s expense on an Aus rugby forum? In any case, Ireland were whinging about having Owens against the ABs in the quarters last year so it’s not a Wallaby only phenomenon. Interestingly, a lot of people seem to be taking the stats posted on this forum quite seriously.
Yes. I have a feeling we are 9 and 1 with Barnes where our average win rate in that time is about 50-50.Wayne Barnes is usually pretty kind to us. If people don't think some refs are suited to some teams you're very naive about rugby.
They are human and even have a sense of humour!
All good mate, respect that you are consistent with your general siding with the ref even if it’s the ABs on the receiving end.Ok sorry UTG, just I was taking most of the posts seriously and thought us starting to pick out certain refs in tests etc was not helping argument. I still get pissed off with AB any supporters including my own AB supporters that point at refs in tests and allude that they favour one team over another, when it really an excuse for their team losing.
I take qwerty's point, but think all refs have some things they watch for, so different teams may seem to have an advantage, but it more cases than not, very good players/coaches know what top refs look for.
Well I think anyone who watched the Clan/Rebel's game last night would have to say that perhaps hometown refs aren't really the problem, as I certainly saw no advantage to either team. Maybe it is competence that is the problem?
Not one person has claimed there is a problem coming from NZ or Aus. The statistics clearly show that as well. As stated above the issue is SA refs in SA. There is a massive disparity between the stats produced when they are reffed by a SA ref to a neutral.Well I think anyone who watched the Clan/Rebel's game last night would have to say that perhaps hometown refs aren't really the problem, as I certainly saw no advantage to either team. Maybe it is competence that is the problem?
Just watched the mini-replay of the Rebels game and I reckon I saw 7 penalty advantages to the hurricanes not awarded (the rebs kept infringing in the lead up to tries, or foul play reversed advantages etc) in the 10 or so minutes of highlights alone.
No real point other than the penalty count doesn't really always tell the whole picture
This is a critical point for any match and particularly a referee.
There's a number of ways of looking at this. Were the advantages a result of infringements that then finished up in actual advantage? What was the referee comms like leading into those advantages? Was the referee actively managing these phases and players weren't listening/chose to act out like naughty boys?
An accrued advantage is the same as a penalty outcome in my eyes. It won't result in the same reward on the scoreboard, but it has a definite effect on the game and should ultimately shape the game.
Good referees minimise PK and Accrued Advantage because they are using these skills to change behaviour.
The call I found most interesting in that match however was the referee asking Aaron Smith if he wanted the penalty now or if he wanted to continue to play with the advantage.
I don't have a problem with this, I reckon a player would appreciate being part of the process rather than the referee just telling them that it's PK time.
It shows good empathy and minimises stoppage time.
For the record, I didn't see this game.
The theory behind not awarding a YC in those instances is that the advantage accrues by scoring the try. I agree, it frustrates the hell out of me too but referees get panned enough as it is, imagine the outcry if they started slinging mustard around in those instances.
As it turned out, the Rebels got a yellow for repeated infringements almost immediately once play was done near their try line. So the ref remembered
This is a critical point for any match and particularly a referee.
There's a number of ways of looking at this. Were the advantages a result of infringements that then finished up in actual advantage? What was the referee comms like leading into those advantages? Was the referee actively managing these phases and players weren't listening/chose to act out like naughty boys?
An accrued advantage is the same as a penalty outcome in my eyes. It won't result in the same reward on the scoreboard, but it has a definite effect on the game and should ultimately shape the game.
Good referees minimise PK and Accrued Advantage because they are using these skills to change behaviour.