Scarfman said:
OK - but here's a question. Where are the 15 year olds that will flock to the boarding schools? Are they playing league? Or are they un-noticed by the selectors because they don't go to a boarding school?
Herein lies one of the great weaknesses of Australian rugby: the emphasis of schools over district for our junior rugby players. These 15 year olds are playing league, Scarfie, on Sundays, and union with their junior clubs on Saturdays.
A lot of parents can't afford six years or whatever of private schooling, so they plan on a minimum of two years at Nudgee, Churchie, TSS, King's, Scots, Joeys or whereever. Pushy parents, mostly fathers if their lad's good at games, look to schools like these as "rugby finishing schools" as they (rightly) realise there are better opportunities for advancement through the schools' route rather than the district one. Other sports, soccer, league, AFL, tennis, swimming, athletics and especially cricket, develop their talented juniors via the district route rather than the schools one.
The non-private schools perform well in rugby in NSW and, it would seem, WA. There's always been a fine tradition of playing union rather than league in high schools in the more established parts of Sydney, say east of Parramatta. League's firmly entrenched in Sydney's western wastelands and it's always been the code of choice for the non-elite Catholic schools in NSW. But the vast majority of those union-playing government schoolboys also play league on Sundays and the talented ones are closely monitored by the NRL clubs, and have their cards marked.
Until we resolve this district v schools dilemma rugby will remain a boutique sport in Australia.