• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Art of winning and losing.

Status
Not open for further replies.

PaarlBok

Rod McCall (65)
In the modern day sport you hear a lot about "Winning is everything". Thats the way we teach our kids and we losing sportmanship and great values along the line.

Paul Dobson in Rugby365 about it
The art of winning and losing
One wonders which is done better - winning or losing. In some ways losing graciously is easier than winning graciously, but both can be revealing of character and personal balance.

Often those who crow loudest in victory are those who did not play and those who complain loudest in defeat are those who did not play.

Players know better than non-players what went into victory and the fickle status of being a victor. Up today may well be down tomorrow. Players tend to understand that. They also understand that in any sporting contest there is likely to be a winner and a loser.

If they are wise, players also respect opponents. Danie Craven, the wisest of men, used to stress the point that in rugby we play against opponents, not enemies. In war enemies are there to be killed but rugby is not a war. Without opponents we would not have a game, and opponents have the same rights that we have - the right to the protection of the laws of the game, the right to enjoy the game and - even - the right to win the game. Doc would say we play with, not against, opponents.

In days of yore there was a super custom in the Western Province. The home captain would call three cheers for the opposition and the opposition would reply in kind, and then the home captain would call for three cheers for the referee. It's not always like that now and the referee is often the first person losers howl against - which may be why in days of yore there was an oversubscription of referees in the Western Province and now a dearth.

After the cheers the players would shake hands. And watch the players nowadays as they form lines to shake hands. They do a lot better than many non-players do. Watch boxers, who have slammed against each other for round after round, and then collapse in a hug at the end of the fight. Watch the generous manners of golfers, and watch Roger Federer. There are many examples of gentlemanly respect and good manners amongst those who actually play.

Federer led big Jo-Wilfried two sets to love and eventually lost. After the winning point, Federer was up at the net, smiling and congratulating. Tsonga went off on a victory dance while Federer packed up. Federer waited. Tsonga returned packed and the two walked off the Wimbledon court, Federer holding back to let Tsonga go first.

Those with longer memories will remember the crowd running onto the field at Newlands to carry off Rhodesian players when Rhodesia beat Province for the first time and Springboks carrying off John Solomon, the Wallaby captain in 1953, when Australia beat South Africa at Newlands.

That is losing with grace.

This year UCT won the Varsity Cup, beating Tukkies in a gripping final. When the final whistle sounded there was an outburst of UCT glee - hugging and dancing. Through it all the UCT captain, Nick Fenton-Wells, pushed his way out to go and shake hands with the disappointed Tukkies players and thank them for the game.

That is winning with grace.

But then last weekend in a Super 15 play-off I saw a player put out his hand to lift an injured opponent. A while back when the Sharks played the Stormers I came across Frans Steyn, still in his togs, heading for the Newlands surgery to see how Jean de Villiers was after being injured in a Steyn tackle. It's Adam Gilchrist walking when he knows he hit the ball. It's about good manners and decency.

We are elated or disappointed but we learn to control/suppress elation and disappointment because we are men, not animals. That is why many find the new rugby habit of hugging and kissing when a try is scored or a trophy won foreign to the self-control the game requires. It was, apart from anything else, far more effective when a team turned blank-faced from a try - telling their opponents that this was not special as they were used to doing it and would do it again. And it would tell themselves that this was the culmination of a team effort, not a solo performance.

Strong men don't dance about in a frenzy of delight. Strong men don't gloat and brag. Strong men don't boo and sneer. Strong men don't have to cheat. Strong men don't howl in blame of a referee. Strong men don't make excuses. Losers do those things and they lose the battle to become better human beings as well.

We have wandered. But the ancient advice given to sportsmen still is valid: win as though you've lost and lose as though you've won.

Rugby always have an unique spirit compare to other sports. The one of what happen on the field, stay on the field. Important we as rugby supporters keep all the good ones and chuck away the bad ones.
 
G

GC

Guest
As much as I love rugby, it's not unique to the sport (and reinforced by the other examples above). Still remember Freddy Flintoff's immediate commiseration with a devastated Brett Lee when we lost the Ashes in 2005. Fine sportsmanship from a great player.

I've always got time for a bit of Steve Waugh-style mental destruction during the game though.
 

PaarlBok

Rod McCall (65)
I've always got time for a bit of Steve Waugh-style mental destruction during the game though.
No problem with that aswell, he was also good off the pitch. Its what happen before/after the win or loss that counts. Sledging is very much part of modern sport, the Aussie cricketers have perfect this art. Shane Warne is one who took it that bit to far in a gentlemans sport.
 

MajorlyRagerly

Trevor Allan (34)
Yep totally agree with that article. I remember reading an interview with Mils after the test last year where the AB's beat the boks in the last minute thanks to the Dagg try. Dagg put his hand up when running in to score it. Mils said afterwards that he had a word in his ear letting him know that doing that was unacceptable & something he must not do again.

Fruean did it on the weekend too - wonder if he got the word.
 

The_Brown_Hornet

John Eales (66)
Great article Paarl. Interesting the comment about three cheers etc. It was the custom when I played the game hopefully it still is. I still see evidence of it at club fixtures in other sports in Australia to this day (my wife's softball team do it without fail every week, as do their opposition). I tell my kids constantly: don't gloat when you win, don't moan when you lose -- it builds character.

One of the things I've always loved about our game (and cricket too) is that you belt the hell out of the opposition on the paddock, but afterwards you shake hands and go have a beer. And one more thing: we didn't invent cricket sledging in Australia and *everyone* does it. It's been part of the game since WG Grace.
 

Scotty

David Codey (61)
Excellent read Paarlbok.

I must admit, one of the things I have always admired about Richie McCaw is how gracious he is in both victory and defeat. Sign of a true champion.

Which is a contrast to how Elsom is at times. Pocock on the other hand........
 

PaarlBok

Rod McCall (65)
And one more thing: we didn't invent cricket sledging in Australia and *everyone* does it. It's been part of the game since WG Grace.
Sure your cricketers havent invented it, they perfected the art and I mean it in a good way. When you had the likes of Warne, McGrath, the Waughs exct. Sledging is worth it when deeds on the field stick into the opponents head. Mean sweet nothing if you cant put the deeds and words together.
 

The_Brown_Hornet

John Eales (66)
Don't worry, I don't take offence to it. I just get a little bemused when everyone in the cricket world points the finger at us for being sledgers, when the reality is that every test playing nation does it. You Saffers have had some pretty good exponents of the art over the years too, I might add ;)
 

TSR

Andrew Slack (58)
'It's not always like that now and the referee is often the first person losers howl against'

I think this is a particularly annoying modern trend.You only have to read some of these threads to see that the referee is a target even before the game has been played. One of the things with rugby is it is a complex game and very hard to referee. Players play at the edge of the law and often two players will be 'bending' the rules at the same time. The referee is expected to penalise infringements but also allow the game to flow. There will always be mistakes.

Obviously some are more critical than others, but often, in the aftermath we ignore the errors of our favourite players but go for the refs jugular.

Anyway, that is my rant - but it would be great if, following this weekend's game, all the discussions revolved around the players.

You wonder how people expect their kids to treat officials with respect when often they are such bad role models.
 

PaarlBok

Rod McCall (65)
'It's not always like that now and the referee is often the first person losers howl against'

I think this is a particularly annoying modern trend.You only have to read some of these threads to see that the referee is a target even before the game has been played. One of the things with rugby is it is a complex game and very hard to referee. Players play at the edge of the law and often two players will be 'bending' the rules at the same time. The referee is expected to penalise infringements but also allow the game to flow. There will always be mistakes.

Obviously some are more critical than others, but often, in the aftermath we ignore the errors of our favourite players but go for the refs jugular.

Anyway, that is my rant - but it would be great if, following this weekend's game, all the discussions revolved around the players.

You wonder how people expect their kids to treat officials with respect when often they are such bad role models.
Very true. Myself think field hockey is much much more technical to ump.
 

PaarlBok

Rod McCall (65)
Ha - have to take your word on that one Paarlbok.
Thats why they have two and both struggle to read the game the same. Also very quick altho I saw they use TMO style nowadays in the big matches up north. Its a very good habit to try only critising refs when you won. Myself qouted this many a time "After losing, critising the ref sound like sour grapes whining" Trust me thats the way I taught my kid aswell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top