Search results

Not really, we are talking about a team made up of Rugby League players compared to a team that won 50-0 against another GPS B's side last week.

Is it not snobby to send a C's team to get towelled up by a B's team 100-0? When their B's team would get smoked as well. Why would you want parents travelling all the way to sport to see their team lose 100-0 when this could be avoided?

Anyone know Riverview Barker 15A's?

Joker, I know who you are and know what you're about. (Ex jboar)

Takes two to tangle, the Barker 9 got in the face of all the Old Boys, no Old boys touched any of them

View by 10 Scots by 3 Newington by 10

Obsession based off what?

Newington +10 Kings +15 View +10

So what you did in 1979 justifies something 40 years later?

They decided to pick props who can't move

CAS 1s 12+ Gps 2s Gps 3s Gps 4s

Funny thing is you do care you write essays on Joeys' discipline and good example for the younger boys, but then you have the Nicoteen Ninths saying otherwise

That's great that it didn't have an effect on the result, but it did in the trial when a Joeys coathanger wasn't binned after being warned by the referee which would have changed the result. Great to see your unbiased acknowledgement of this error but not the one a couple weeks ago.

Newington Joeys Scots Riverview Kings Shore

Well everyone was laughing saying he was the 10 without a doubt

Nicoteen ninths are a great example for the young kids

Joeys 9ths defeat Moriah 2s 10-3

Why? Because he will have a field day when he plays GPS?

Joker you're kidding yourself, if you read my comment properly you'd see I was simply saying that there should be talk about more than 1 10 who's played 1 full game. Coming from someone who posts the scores of 4th XV and coming up with injury excuses for them, I wouldn't call anyone a kid.

Or disliking that no other 10 has been mentioned? Yeah that is laughable