Search results

YC after the bell. Tom you muppet.

And Deegan's ace kicking continues.

+1 on the Rebel halves.

I see a theme. TBF if there is a team playing tonight hoping to dominate the WBs, so far it is not the Brumbies.

I like that bot teams are passing and playing. It might be NH weather but it's not a NH slug fest.

Banks is certainly going to be tested tonight.

REBELS_ON_FIRE

Agreed.

Lleichardt looks miserable. And cold.

Not really, but Pocock might have made an interesting 2. Hooper may have been a Stewart style 12. In the mean time, Hooper is an excellent 7.

Seems to be tearing ars*holes in QPR as well. We are better off without these palookas.

Trying hard not to swear here. so... FADOODLE! What are these blokes doing on a rugby field? Mafi, Mafi, Mafi.

Haha! Like it and who knows?

I stand corrected. Is not 17 LH and 18 TH?

Generally wont Tupou play 80? So injury cover plus a reward for the kid. He should enjoy it.

have h I speak for myself, Derpus. Not half the fan base. And I have never "slagged off" Hooper. There is no doubt however that Hooper, or more the Pooper, created balance issues. Going back in time I probably would have preferred LFG, but this doesn't change what Hooper has given in pretty...

I'm happy with everything you've said. Still think we wouldn't miss Hooper with the caveat I gave presuming they step up. I don't have an issue with Hooper at all, just the attitude that he is somehow anointed to the role.

This is misdirection. Reds have a 30 year old starting at 10, with at best serviceable back up options, one of whom is also a similar age, and the other who failed to make it at 10 after plenty of chance (I'm not dissing Stewart, just how I see it). This also on the back of the Reds selection...

I don't get opinions like this. "Get real" should perhaps apply to understanding that perhaps other fans think differently. I see no reason whatsoever to swallow the first line on the sheet "correct" thinking. Hooper is certainly in the running. If our youngsters were to step up though, we'd...

This is how it looks to me.