• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

New "LIV Style" Global Rugby League

New "Liv Style" Global Rugby League?

  • This is silly, I forbid it

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • Let's do this crazy thing

    Votes: 6 22.2%
  • This will save Australian Rugby

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • I don't like change, it scares me.

    Votes: 5 18.5%
  • The stuffy conservative poms at HQ will lawyer up and nix it

    Votes: 3 11.1%
  • Melbourne Rebs ride again baby

    Votes: 8 29.6%
  • Time to dissolve the NSFW Waratahs

    Votes: 9 33.3%
  • they had a good run

    Votes: 3 11.1%
  • This will never happen ffs

    Votes: 7 25.9%
  • I Love Pole

    Votes: 9 33.3%

  • Total voters
    27

Upthemaroon!

Ward Prentice (10)
Is there actually any appetite for this at all? Rugby has always been more team driven than player driven support wise, and no one cares about these made up teams at all
The appetite for it is mostly based on the group of people that do go to a sellout Optus Stadium this weekend, but are not part of the 8000 or so fans at HBF park watching the Force during SRP (Super Rugby Pacific). I don't know if those people will watch R360, but there is a rather large latent pool of casual rugby viewers that isn't yet mobilized/targeted/activated/whateverbuzzwordyouwanttocallit by club rugby.
 

Braveheart81

Will Genia (78)
Staff member
The appetite for it is mostly based on the group of people that do go to a sellout Optus Stadium this weekend

Because the Wallabies vs All Blacks is a premium event steeped in history.

Madrid vs Miami, even if it does include a chunk of very good players is not that. I fail to see how this would be the thing that captures the attention of casual fans.
 

Upthemaroon!

Ward Prentice (10)
Because the Wallabies vs All Blacks is a premium event steeped in history.

Madrid vs Miami, even if it does include a chunk of very good players is not that. I fail to see how this would be the thing that captures the attention of casual fans.
Oh don't get me wrong, me neither. Just wanted to highlight there is a large pool of 'potential' fans that a couple of spreadsheet blazers want to mobilize. Don't think this set up will work, but there is a massive opportunity there.
 

Tomthumb

Jim Lenehan (48)
The appetite for it is mostly based on the group of people that do go to a sellout Optus Stadium this weekend, but are not part of the 8000 or so fans at HBF park watching the Force during SRP (Super Rugby Pacific) (Super Rugby Pacific). I don't know if those people will watch R360, but there is a rather large latent pool of casual rugby viewers that isn't yet mobilized/targeted/activated/whateverbuzzwordyouwanttocallit by club rugby.
People are going to Optus becasue it's The All Blacks vs the Wallabies; NZ vs Australia. It's tribal, it's passionate

There is no hook for casual viewers to watch random teams from random places play a game with zero stakes
 

Wilson

Tim Horan (67)
Because the Wallabies vs All Blacks is a premium event steeped in history.

Madrid vs Miami, even if it does include a chunk of very good players is not that. I fail to see how this would be the thing that captures the attention of casual fans.
It is so very clearly marketed to the English fan, particularly avoiding the depths of winter with match blocks - if I was still living in London, I'd be booking a rugby trip to Madrid or Lisbon for a game weekend in a heartbeat. Not sure that's particularly sustainable after the novelty wears off though.
 

Wilson

Tim Horan (67)
New Player 30 game per year limit protocol could throw a further spanner in the works, how are the thirty games divided up between club / country and 360
That regulation (or really just guideline at this point) favours R360 and is something they'd be happy to see - a 16ish game season aligns perfectly with the 14 or so test matches most tier 1 teams are topping out at. Much easier for a player to get that balance then in top 14 with their 26 game season.
 

Tomthumb

Jim Lenehan (48)
It is so very clearly marketed to the English fan, particularly avoiding the depths of winter with match blocks - if I was still living in London, I'd be booking a rugby trip to Madrid or Lisbon for a game weekend in a heartbeat. Not sure that's particularly sustainable after the novelty wears off though.
Maybe, I think the novelty would wear off pretty fast though

And are these teams going to practice at all or just show up a couple of days before the event? Could be some pretty dire rugby in that case
 

Upthemaroon!

Ward Prentice (10)
People are going to Optus becasue it's The All Blacks vs the Wallabies; NZ vs Australia. It's tribal, it's passionate

There is no hook for casual viewers to watch random teams from random places play a game with zero stakes
Yeah fair, I love the tribalism and passion as well don't get me wrong. There are just a fair bit of people wanting to have a reason to go on a weekend away, get steaming with the boys (or girls), see some big hits and offloads and put no more effort into their fandom. The SailGP also works for that reason.

edit: And there is a whole layer of sports washing for Saudia Arabia which I hate with a passion and will be the main reason I won't watch it. There is just a large contingency of people that do not care about that and want a good piss up somewhere that is not their city.
 

Dctarget

David Wilson (68)
Depending on the funding rumours (the players are signing with the UAE rugby union), we might be missing the point.

The NEOM Line was never more than a fantastical project to generate conversation/attract top class professionals whilst never turning a profit (read: lose billions and billions).

Even closer to home Japan's Top League clearly don't give a shit about fan attendance and footprint, yet they're sustainably paying absolute overs for our middling players.
 

Omar Comin'

Peter Fenwicke (45)
I agree, why would I watch it? Not my club, state or national team. Not in my country and a few {maybe} players I know of. I don't follow players, I follow clubs.

I share a lot of the scepticism you and others have, and on balance expect it to fail. But it's not impossible for new competitions and new clubs or franchises to build a following and be successful.

Why not be open minded about it and wait to see what it's actually like first? A lot of the big soccer clubs and NBA teams etc have a lot more fans outside their home city than within it - this competition is trying to engineer that sort of global supporter base from day 1. How do we know that's not possible?

What if it's a huge success and becomes the F1/NBA/EPL of rugby and results in the sport being much bigger at every level? If some people with very deep pockets want to give that a crack, even though the odds are small, then I'm interested to see the attempt. At the very least we'll get a few gun NRL players switching over for a couple of years and some may stick around and strengthen the Wallabies.
 

Tex

Greg Davis (50)
I've never been surer of a future event than the rapid deflation and fade-to-irrelevance than this 360 venture.

It genuinely looks shit.
 
Top