I feel as though that's a very harsh analysis.
No one decides to tackle someone high; it's a mistake that happens when playing contact sports, so to say they "resorted" to tackling high is just plain wrong. Further, the scuffle in the first half was when the game was drawn, so I'm not sure what you are actually getting at there. Yes, I can admit the no-arms tackle was, and should have been a red card, but this idea that you're inferring Oakhill are grubby and egotistical is quite unfair.
Secondly, if I were the coach, losing to a couple of interceptions is probably the best way to lose a game. If those couple of passes weren't thrown, Oakhill might've walked away with it, and the conversation would be a lot different.
Yes, they need to lift this week, but that's the great thing about footy, you only have to wait a week to come out and give a response.