Recent content by JRugby2

That should make it easier to understand

Im not sure the running between wickets thing is true. The guy got hit in the head a lot. He did have well documented mental health challenges though. Although Joe Schmidt alluded to Lynagh potentially over playing his hamstring issues last year, it's probably unfair to outright assume that...

It's slowly becoming Pucovski-esque

The wording of the law is purposely ambiguous ("The ruck ends and play continues when the ball leaves the ruck or when the ball in the ruck is on or over the try line"). In some rucks, the ball isn't out until it's completely removed from bodies (despite it being lifted), in others - a lift is...

Sure, but that convention you refer to can easily be extended to Len's try. He's the halfback, the ball was available and so he dug it out as you say. If the laws had words to reflect this commonly allowed convention - it wouldn't change anything, the try would still be fine. I get you're not...

But if you aren't bound, you're not a part of the ruck - and provided you're onside (behind the hindmost point), and the ball is available to be played (referee determination) - you're allowed to handle the ball. Rucks can't occur in goal, so 15.16f doesn't apply, and so I interpret the real...

Im trying but Im not a rationale man

Happy it was a non call but 15 throwing himself of the wrong side of the ruck can get in the bin. Not even an advantage given….

What was dumb about that? He stood up and got pinged

This is unwatchable

Criticizing obvious misses. Wobs doing enough to lose it on their own

Mostly good but some real obvious duds

Yeah sick thats a completely invented interpretation

How the fuck was that off feet?

Does this bloke have a clue what a maul is or what?