he's born in 2003, making him 19He just turned 18 in February... 3 seconds of research would have told you that... do your due diligence before you carry on like a turkey.
he's born in 2003, making him 19He just turned 18 in February... 3 seconds of research would have told you that... do your due diligence before you carry on like a turkey.
Thought the Knox tighthead would have been selected.CAS U16s. Word from the trials is a number were preselected and didn't have to do anything. Surprising Knox seem to be the leading team and have limited numbers. Fair spread from the schools though.
First Name Surname School Daniel Christodoulou Trinity Grammar School 1 Max Meagher Trinity Grammar School 2 Nick Hill Barker College 3 Sam Niulala Trinity Grammar School 4 Zion Potiha Waverley College 5 Nathaniel Thomas Barker College 6 Oliver Aboud Waverley College 7 Heath Turner Knox Grammar School 8 Kera Weaver Barker College 9 Troy Patea Waverley College 10 Declan Minto Waverley College 11 Lance Tovio Cranbrook School 12 Kahu Capper Waverley College 13 Max Roach Knox Grammar School 14 Dylan Hall Knox Grammar School 15 Joseph Tangi Waverley College 16 Luka Ponsonby St Aloysius College 17 Sebastian Gyngell Knox Grammar School 19 James Nestor Waverley College 19 Amosia Soatini Trinity Grammar School 20 Hugo Schneider Waverley College 21 Dane Mitchell Trinity Grammar School 22 Malik Amine Trinity Grammar School 23 Jaxson Allen Cranbrook School 24 Ben Blanchard Barker College 25
Thought the Knox tighthead would have been selected.
No he’s born 2004, don’t believe everything you read online. Journos are poor researchers too. He signed for the Dolphins in February on his 18th birthday, check the dolphins tweet on Feb 18th 2022he's born in 2003, making him 19
Nope. 2004.he's born in 2003, making him 19
I now have confirmation straight from the family. He is 18. 2004. Move on.he's born in 2003, making him 19
So from the Knox pack they have the 8 and a reserve. They would have the best pack in that age group?Sadly he’s injured. Dislocated shoulder so out for the season.
As a Waves dad, I watched the 16as game last Sat. Knox were very good in the 1st half, Waves did bomb at least 1 try over the line, and Knox led 19-0 just before half time. However, this Waves side has been terrific all year, except for the Newington game of which there was 1 main reason but no comment. After half time the Waves side showed great character and ran all over the Knox side, ultimately winning 28- 19.So from the Knox pack they have the 8 and a reserve. They would have the best pack in that age group?
Jay Harris has been mentioned. What happened to the rest?
Counterpoint from a Knox perspective. The Knox forwards has been brilliant this year. Unfortunately for the Waves game 3 of the starting pack were out, including the 2 props and an influential back-rower. The two props have been massive and both would have been up for rep honours if not for season ending injuries. On the day Waves were better - it would have been great to a battle of full strength teams though; will need to wait to opens.As a Waves dad, I watched the 16as game last Sat. Knox were very good in the 1st half, Waves did bomb at least 1 try over the line, and Knox led 19-0 just before half time. However, this Waves side has been terrific all year, except for the Newington game of which there was 1 main reason but no comment. After half time the Waves side showed great character and ran all over the Knox side, ultimately winning 28- 19.
The Waves forwards led this charge, so NO the Knox forward pack isn't the best pack in this age group, and both the Waves massive go forward props didn't play! . The Knox 8 was terrific, but so was the Waves 8, both are in the CAS team, the Knox 15 was something else, his speed, size, and skill is terrific. I am also extremely surprised that no 16 reserve Waves prop isn't starting, maybe coming back from injury is the reason, but he was starting for the 1st XV a few games ago.
Just hope that this CAS will play their best, if so, they will be very difficult to beat. Go the CAS!
This may sound far fetched but I have it on very reliable sources that some CAS don't want their school/teams live streamed as they are not competitive and it isn't a good look. Yep that was the answer I was given, and unfortunately the fact is real.CAS v GPS not being streamed tomorrow, CAS couldn’t come to an agreement with GPS. I don’t know the full backstory but CAS are generally against rugby streaming. (given you can watch 4th grade subbies and under 12s rugby on cluch there’s obviously a deeper reason)… any idea which schools are the main driver for this continued refusal to stream rugby games? I’m neither for or against as I attend the games… I know that cluch is run by a current CAS rugby parent so it feels like a decision made on the grounds of ethics / protecting teens from negative exposure etc. as I said just interested to understand the main reasoning, not passing judgment
I think there was initially an ethical argument to be made against streaming of children's sport. But given how all pervasive it is now (and expected) I dont know if there's any more oomph left in that argument. I coach another sport that has a reasonably long history of games being streamed and the teams I have worked with are quite disappointed if they cant't get a live stream game. It becomes a memento of their performance and they love it.CAS v GPS not being streamed tomorrow, CAS couldn’t come to an agreement with GPS. I don’t know the full backstory but CAS are generally against rugby streaming. (given you can watch 4th grade subbies and under 12s rugby on cluch there’s obviously a deeper reason)… any idea which schools are the main driver for this continued refusal to stream rugby games? I’m neither for or against as I attend the games… I know that cluch is run by a current CAS rugby parent so it feels like a decision made on the grounds of ethics / protecting teens from negative exposure etc. as I said just interested to understand the main reasoning, not passing judgment
All the more reason why these competitions need to be restructured.
Spot on Eyes!All the more reason why these competitions need to be restructured.
Barker have lost to Joeys 1 time in 6 years, and have recently often been the best schoolboy team in the state. Knox are consistently beating GPS teams. Waverely are also beating GPS teams and have also recently been able to produce teams who are arguably the best schoolboy teams in the state. Yeah right.This may sound far fetched but I have it on very reliable sources that some CAS don't want their school/teams live streamed as they are not competitive and it isn't a good look. Yep that was the answer I was given, and unfortunately the fact is real.
Couldn't agree more DaS. Trouble with your argument is that it makes too much sense.I think there was initially an ethical argument to be made against streaming of children's sport. But given how all pervasive it is now (and expected) I dont know if there's any more oomph left in that argument. I coach another sport that has a reasonably long history of games being streamed and the teams I have worked with are quite disappointed if they cant't get a live stream game. It becomes a memento of their performance and they love it.
SkyBlue, you know I know all this, I am clearly talking about the other schools!Barker have lost to Joeys 1 time in 6 years, and have recently often been the best schoolboy team in the state. Knox are consistently beating GPS teams. Waverely are also beating GPS teams and have also recently been able to produce teams who are arguably the best schoolboy teams in the state. Yeah right.
Fast. Nice step.Some great highlights below.