Hasbeen
Bob Loudon (25)
Thanks Flavio for responding. CheersNo restrictions just the usual Service NSW login, which is good because it makes you log out from the pub from the night before
Thanks Flavio for responding. CheersNo restrictions just the usual Service NSW login, which is good because it makes you log out from the pub from the night before
Recognising that Barker have thrown everything, including the kitchen sink, at a chance to win this year as well.
Thanks Flavio for responding. Cheers
Maybe, maybe. Look, I don't want to write anyone off, and Knox showed by beating Riverview that they're a handy side. But that loss to Oakhill suggests to me that they're a step or two behind Barker and Waverley.
I don't deny that Knox were strong coming through in this age group, but that means less than it used to. If you look back at the CAS Under-16 side two years ago, Waverley had 11 of the 25 representatives, which accurately reflected its position in that competition. Waverley beat Knox 38-14, incidentally. Barker had six, Knox four, Trinity three and St Aloysius one. I accept that this is an imperfect proxy for the strength of the age group, but on that basis you'd expect Waverley to boss it over everyone with Barker and Knox fighting over the scraps.
But, as we know, teams change a lot these days with newcomers into Year 11, and of course some schools with weaker age groups promote younger players over them into the Firsts (a few years back, for example, almost all of Cranbrook's 1st XV were in Year 11). The fact is, Barker has gone from having a really good core of players (those six CAS reps included Slack-Smith and Sangala) to being on par with Waverley. That said, I don't think it's out of the question that Knox could beat them.
Agree Wlf. But a very strong CAS side is brewing. Given the barker 10 sounds to be the real deal I assume that Morrison from
Knox will be squeezed to 15 even though the current knox 15 (Tucker) is more than capable. some interesting selection debates to be had. I would imagine that barker and waves make up the bulk of the side but bray, black, Morrison and McLeod would be my certainties from knox with Goddard, saunders and tucker more than capable at that level. I haven’t seen barker or waves yet so they may be stronger in the those positions (9,13,15). This CAS side feels similar to 2017
It was a looooooong lunch Axel. Lee’s Fortuna Court perhaps?Rod, you've known me a loooooong time...i only speak the truth. Barker have to be favourites this year, with Waves just behind them.
It was a looooooong lunch Axel. Lee’s Fortuna Court perhaps?
So I assume by now most schools have a pretty good idea what their best XV is. Any team news for Saturday?
To all GPS and CAS supporters,
I just happened to see that the annual Rep game between these two associations is June 10, so not far off!
That means the CAS will have had 2 comp rounds and the GPS 1 comp round.
I know this happens every year, but in the good old days, it happened after the last comp game was played, I assume many can remember this occurence!
So whilst players have had a number of games under their belt, eg the cross association games etc, you wouldn't imagine selectors having been at many/any of these games, or necessarily the best games to be at, which makes me think these Rep teams are chosen way too early. I know politics always prevails as to who is already selected, even before strapping on a boot, but wow, to me this does not give all boys an equal opportunity to press for selection, and is way too early in the season.
This has been the process in recent years but can anyone explain why?
Keen for other peoples views!
By the way, we all enjoy defeating the other foe in these match-ups, but I would still much rather win my association!
To all GPS and CAS supporters,
I just happened to see that the annual Rep game between these two associations is June 10, so not far off!
That means the CAS will have had 2 comp rounds and the GPS 1 comp round.
I know this happens every year, but in the good old days, it happened after the last comp game was played, I assume many can remember this occurence!
So whilst players have had a number of games under their belt, eg the cross association games etc, you wouldn't imagine selectors having been at many/any of these games, or necessarily the best games to be at, which makes me think these Rep teams are chosen way too early. I know politics always prevails as to who is already selected, even before strapping on a boot, but wow, to me this does not give all boys an equal opportunity to press for selection, and is way too early in the season.
This has been the process in recent years but can anyone explain why?
Keen for other peoples views!
By the way, we all enjoy defeating the other foe in these match-ups, but I would still much rather win my association!
Agree, WLF, but I think this is a consequence of the four-term school year and the need to play the Schools championship in the mid-year break. I doubt it can be changed. Nor does there seem to be a great will to change it: I agree with Rod's observation that the championships have now been devalued to an unfortunate extent.
I also think your last point is right. I remember a few years back, there was an Associated Schools side that needed (for the balance of the team) a player to play in a particular position. He argued that playing in another position would improve his chances of CAS selection. His coach told him: "Maybe. But no-one remembers who plays CAS. Everyone remembers who wins premierships."
To all GPS and CAS supporters,
I just happened to see that the annual Rep game between these two associations is June 10, so not far off!
That means the CAS will have had 2 comp rounds and the GPS 1 comp round.
I know this happens every year, but in the good old days, it happened after the last comp game was played, I assume many can remember this occurence!
So whilst players have had a number of games under their belt, eg the cross association games etc, you wouldn't imagine selectors having been at many/any of these games, or necessarily the best games to be at, which makes me think these Rep teams are chosen way too early. I know politics always prevails as to who is already selected, even before strapping on a boot, but wow, to me this does not give all boys an equal opportunity to press for selection, and is way too early in the season.
This has been the process in recent years but can anyone explain why?
Keen for other peoples views!
By the way, we all enjoy defeating the other foe in these match-ups, but I would still much rather win my association!
Totally agree with your comments WLF. As Rod Skillet mentioned, the Head Masters from the different school associations are bound by their yearly sporting calendars. I suppose not all people are rugby crazy like many of us on this forum. If it was up us the boys would be playing rugby all year round.
With the representative season in a month’s time I will say the selectors have hard task at hand especially in the CAS competition.
Having watched Barker, Knox and Waverley this year I’d have to say majority of the CAS 1st XV team will be made up players from these schools. All three schools mentioned have big, strong, mobile and skilful forwards who provide clean and clear ball for backs to weave their magic.
Somehow I can’t see the GPS 1st XV team matching the CAS team in size in the forwards which might be a difference however they should match them everywhere else on the park.
Cheers
Love2Scrum
You are a gentleman L2S,
What I luv is your GPS passion, truth being that all these boys. from both associations, are very good players, have probably minimal team cohesion, so who knows in a Rep side!
I admire that you have watched a number of games that involved our CAS schools, I can only assume you are a proud Shoreman!
If you really want the low down on who is the best team and the best players in the CAS, best to talk to Rod Skellet and Snort who have seen their own teams v numerous other schools, many times.